|
|
|
You can get e-magazine links on WhatsApp. Click here
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food safety, traceability & compliance in 2026
|
|
Monday, 13 April, 2026, 15 : 00 PM [IST]
|
|
Aakriti Kapoor
|
Food safety, traceability and compliance are one of those significant giants that need to be in your court when you are running a food industry. Every possible food operation should revolve around them to get a “safe” food product. Year 2025 was all about trending “fake paneer” articles, where everybody was behind its authenticity. Social media influencers and even the basic consumers checked its authenticity with iodine tincture and to a no surprise high profile brands like McDonald’s were failing in the test. As the calendar turns 2026, an outrage of non-compliance of microbial food standards in milk samples were all over the press.
In an era increasingly defined by health-conscious and well-informed consumers, the food industry faces the critical constrain to deliver products that are both nutritionally adequate and microbiologically and chemically safe, that is a fundamental prerequisite for establishing and maintaining brand trust and loyalty. Inspectors in 2026 will focus heavily on environmental monitoring, validation of preventive controls, and root-cause investigations. This creates a higher bar for facilities, demanding a culture of food safety that permeates every level of operation.
The food industry is not merely adjusting to incremental change but driving a systemic transformation. A more assertive judiciary, a regulator increasingly reliant on data-driven oversight, and a consumer base that demands verifiable proof rather than marketing promises have collectively redefined the operating environment. Compliance, once relegated to a back-office, paperwork-heavy function, is now being reshaped into a forward-facing paradigm built on scientific rigour, end-to-end digital traceability, and a regulatory framework that mirrors the complexity and diversity of the market it governs. Yet, this complexity introduces significant vulnerabilities. Other factors like climate change, pesticide use, land degradation, development of antibiotic-resistant micro-organisms and residual animal growth hormones in the food supply chain also makes food safety and traceability crucial for food industry operations in India. High adulteration rates, mislabelling and storage issues calls for stronger regulations and detection tools highlighting the mandate of compliance in food industry.
For food manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, the concept of "trust" is no longer implicit; it must be engineered. This engineering relies on three critical, interconnected pillars: Food Safety, Traceability, and Compliance. While often discussed separately, their convergence forms the backbone of a resilient and reputable food operation. Food safety has transitioned from reactive end-product testing to proactive prevention. Currently, food industry 4.0 was originated back from Germany, where the fourth-generation technology is readily employed for various operations, which comprise of a fusion of physical biological and digital food operations. Food industry 4.0 has introduced technologies like IoT (Internet of Things), block chain management, AI, robotics, Big Data and cloud computing. Nowadays in food industry every operation is interconnected via cyber-physical systems (IoT) with a basic aim to identify the food origin, protect the food in transits and decrement in cost and time of food recall.
Tectonic shift has been seen in the traceability of food that is from farm to QR code. This QR code also serves a digital passport of it. Traceability is achieved through GS1 standards and blockchain, creating immutable digital passports for every product. QR codes capture lot numbers, expiry dates, and serial identifiers at each scan point, while blockchain ledgers record every transfer of custody and environmental reading, enabling rapid, surgical recalls that minimise waste and protect consumer trust. RFID tags also provide similar function as QR codes. Likewise, wireless sensors employed in cold chain conditions forecast equipment failures in no time before they occur, and advanced air-quality systems detect pathogens such as Listeria to trigger automated sanitisation. Recently, water has been listed as a high-risk commodity by FSSAI and BIS standardisation has been removed from the water as the product category has been reclassified, bringing with it a compulsory testing scheme and mandatory third-party audits.
Manufacturers must now maintain exhaustive batch-wise records of mineral addition, source water testing, and stringent hygienic protocols. For such cases this if cryptographic data is obtained by smart technologies ensures non-fabrication of data also makes data audit ready. Currently, transition towards Industry 5.0 is also coming up, where the sustainability, human-centric approach and resilience are the three main pillars of it.
This judicial push is likely to catapult India into the league of nations with mandatory warning labels, fundamentally altering packaging design and marketing strategies for a huge swath of the FMCG sector. The court has explicitly asked the FSSAI to consider implementing prominent warning labels on the front of packages for foods high in sugar, salt, and saturated fat. The message is clear: nutritional information buried in fine print on the back of the pack is insufficient to protect the "right to health" of citizens. While the FSSAI has been deliberating on nutritional labelling, the Supreme Court of India has injected a sense of urgency into the process. In February 2026, the court intervened in a Public Interest Litigation concerning Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling (FoPNL), expressing dissatisfaction with the regulator's pace.
Although the attempt is going on to digitalise the whole food industry processes certainly there is cost of every operation which may burden the small-scale industry as this may add up to additional cost of a product and might affect the end-consumer. Moreover, other limitations like insufficient human capital required for digital operations, resistance in change of mindset of proprietors and people.
In the ending note, for the industry, as the Indian consumer, empowered by the judiciary and digital tools, is becoming an active auditor of quality. Therefore, the path forward requires a significant upgrade in capabilities where data flows seamlessly from the point of origin to the point of sale, ensuring that every product is safe, its journey is known, and its compliance is provable. Success in 2026 will belong to those who can navigate the new scientific risk assessment formats, invest in farm-to-fork digital infrastructure, and prepare for a future where a product's label must speak the truth loudly, clearly, and verifiably to a scrutinising nation. Conclusively, it’s not in a one-handed practice, collective efforts of everyone involved in food operations - farmer, produce handlers, packers, distributors and industry personnel are necessary for the success of these digital tools and will collectively contribute to sustainable development goals by 2030.
(The author is from Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|